Handing the White House a huge judicial victory, the U.S. Supreme court on Monday governed in the interests of President Trump’s travel ban changing inhabitants of six majority-Muslim countries.

The justices said the policy can take full upshot despite multiple legal challenges against it that haven’t hitherto determined their mode through the law system.

The ban applies to people from Syria, Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

Lower fields had said beings from those countries with a “bona fide” relationship with person in the United States could not be prevented from entry.

Grandparents and cousins were among the relateds tribunals said could not be excluded.

The nine-member high court said in two one-page dictates late Monday afternoon that lower court rulings that partly obstructed the prohibitions should be put on hold while court of appeals in Richmond, Va ., and San Francisco take up the case.

Liberal-leaning Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place.

The rights offered no reason for their line-up, but the administration had said that blocking the full prohibition was motiving “irreparable harm” because the policy is based on lawful national its safety and foreign policy concerns.

Both laws are scheduled to hear justifications in those cases this week.

Both courts are also dealing with the issue on an accelerated basis, and the United states supreme court mentioned it expects those courts to reach decisions “with appropriate dispatch.”

Quick resolution by appellate courts would be facilitated the Supreme Court to hear and judge the issue this term, by the end of June.

White House Deputy Press Secretary Hogan Gidley called the ban “lawful and essential to protecting our homeland.”

Gidley contributed in a statement, “We look forward to presenting a fuller defense of the proclamation as the pending instances wreak their road through the courts.”

“We are glad to see that the Supreme court has agreed to allow us to fulfill this most vital duty to be provided by any sovereign society. DHS will continue to fully implement the President’s robust and Constitutional counterterrorism agenda in accordance with the law, ” the Department of Homeland Security’s behaving press secretary, Tyler Q. Houlton, said.

Trump’s travel ban has been requested in separate lawsuits by Hawaii and the American Civil Liberties Union. Both have argued the prohibitions discriminates against Muslims and should not move into impression under immigration laws.

“President Trump’s anti-Muslim prejudice is common knowledge — he has repeatedly established it, including just last week on Twitter, ” Omar Jadwat, chairman of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said in a statement. “It’s unfortunate that the full proscribe be moving for now, however order does not address the merits of our declares. We continue to stand for freedom, equality, and for those who are unfairly being separated from their loved ones. We will be arguing Friday in the Fourth Circuit that the prohibitions should ultimately be struck down.”

Trump issued his first trip disallow within days of being cuss in as director. That version tightened the country’s refugee and visa policies and postponed virtually all refugee admissions for four months.

Trump issued a revised version in March after the first was blocked by federal laws. The second one expired in September after a interminable law combat and was replaced with the current version.

Fox News’ Jake Gibson, Bill Mears and The Associated Press contributed to this report.